Ioan Alexandru Teglas vs Vlad Stoica Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
Wojtek Kolan
Published on 23 Jun at 01:02 PM UTC
HEAD TO HEAD
I. Alexandru Teglas vs V. Stoica

ROU
1
Win
Played
1
Win

ROU
1
Win
Played
1
Win
Head-to-head: Teglas 1 - 1 Stoica
They have played 6 sets in total, with Ioan Alexandru Teglas winning 3 and Vlad Stoica winning 3. The last match between Vlad Stoica and Ioan Alexandru Teglas was at the M15 Curtea de Arges, 03-08-2025, Round: Q1, Surface: Clay, with Vlad Stoica getting the victory 3-6 6-2 10-3.
| Players | Head To Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Teglas | 1 |
| Stoica | 1 |
Last 2 H2H Matches:
(Q1) M15 Curtea de Arges(08-03-25)
(Q3) M25 Targu Mures(06-23-25)
I. A. Teglas vs V. Stoica H2H Profile
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| $0 | Career Prize Money | $0 |
| 30.10% (31-72) | Career Total W/L | 35.79% (34-61) |
| 1 | Clay | 1 |
| 1 | Total H2H Matches | 1 |
| 0% (0-0) | YTD Win/Loss | 0% (0-0) |
I. A. Teglas vs V. Stoica Match Preview:
- Second Serve Performance: Through recent play, Stoica has struggled, winning 0% of points on their second serve. Conversely, Teglas has managed to secure 16.67%. Could this indicate a significant advantage for Teglas?
- Return Game Stats: When it comes to returning serves, Stoica is again at 0% for both their opponent's first and second serves. Teglas, however, demonstrates a clear edge, winning 41.67% on second serves and 22.22% on first serves.
- Pressure Situations: Stoica is yet to save a breakpoint recently, while Teglas has saved 25% under similar situations. How critical might this be in determining match outcomes?
- Overall Performance: Stoica fares slightly better overall, with a win rate of 44.44% over the past year, compared to Teglas’s 34.38%.
- Preferred Playing Surface: Stoica shines most on hard courts with 46% wins, whereas Teglas performs best on clay with a 32% win rate.
- Level of Competition: Stoica has competed mostly in lower-tier tournaments, with Teglas facing opponents averaging a rank of 67.84.
- Deciding Set Performance: Interestingly, Stoica boasts a perfect record in deciding sets over the last 12 months, winning 100% of them, compared to Teglas’s 38%.
- Break Point Conversion: Both players struggle here, converting 0% of their opportunities recently.
Editorial Prediction (June 23, 2025, UTC):
The recent form charts a clear contrast between Stoica and Teglas, with Teglas demonstrating superior second serve performance and returning effectiveness. These strengths align well with match prediction trends and favor Teglas in these encounters.
Stoica's advantage lies in overall performance over the past year and flawless deciding set record, suggesting resilience under critical scenarios. However, the lack of effectiveness in saving breakpoints and converting opportunities presents a disadvantage.
Given the comparative analysis, while Stoica has demonstrated persistence, Teglas displays attributes that are more closely correlated with match-winning potential. Therefore, Teglas appears more likely to triumph in the forthcoming match.
Ioan Alexandru Teglas vs Vlad Stoica Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88.
I. A. Teglas vs V. Stoica H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 1 | H2H Matches Won | 1 |
| 3 | Sets Won | 3 |
| 29 | Games Won | 38 |
| 0 | Aces (Total) | 1 |
| 3 | Total Double Faults | 8 |
| 1:0:44 | Average Match Time | 1:0:44 |
| 64% (39/61) | 1st Serve % | 56% (45/80) |
| 56% (22/39) | 1st Serve Win % | 62% (28/45) |
| 45% (10/22) | 2nd Serve Win % | 40% (14/35) |
| 43% (3/7) | Break Pts Won % | 50% (4/8) |
| 48% (38/80) | Return Points Win % | 48% (29/61) |
| 50% (1/2) | Best‑of‑3 Win % | 50% (1/2) |
| 50% (1/2) | Deciding Set Win % | 50% (1/2) |
| 50% (1/2) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 50% (1/2) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 50% (1/2) |
Recent Performance Stats
I. A. Teglas Recent Matches Played
V. Stoica Recent Matches Played

I. A. Teglas vs V. Stoica Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 30.10% (31/72) | YTD Win/Loss | 35.79% (34/61) |
| 36.05% (84/149) | Sets Win/Loss | 36.28% (78/137) |
| 44.28% (1011/1272) | Games Win/Loss | 44.25% (908/1144) |
| 19.23% (5/21) | Hard Win/Loss | 46.15% (6/7) |
| 33.77% (26/51) | Clay Win/Loss | 34.18% (27/52) |
| 0% (0/0) | Indoor Hard W/L | 33.33% (1/2) |
| 0.01 | Aces Per Game | 0.02 |
| 9 | Aces Total | 22 |
| 0.02 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.11 |
| 20 | Total Double Faults | 110 |
| 1st Match | Average Match Time | 1st Match |
| 74.17 | Average Opponent Rank | 181.89 |
| 64% (386/604) | 1st Serve % | 56% (549/978) |
| 59% (228/386) | 1st Serve Win % | 53% (290/549) |
| 41% (90/218) | 2nd Serve Win % | 37% (158/429) |
| 49% (24/49) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 42% (26/62) |
| 40% (235/590) | Return Points Win % | 35% (312/902) |
| 0% (0/0) | Challenger W/L | 50.00% (1/1) |
| 30.10% (31/72) | Futures W/L | 35.48% (33/60) |
| 30% (31/102) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 35% (33/93) |
| 53% (9/17) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 50% (9/18) |
| 21% (6/28) | Deciding Set Win % | 59% (16/27) |
| 67% (43/29) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 84% (32/27) |
| 33% (43/14) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 16% (32/5) |
| 3% (60/2) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 11% (63/7) |